Transformations?
"Become" a character!
...we hear that all the time in drama settings ... we expect the actors we see on screen or on stage to convince us they are a different person for those two hours. And we believe them.My previous question (about whether you expect to feel like a character you play) was designed to get you thinking about what actually happens on stage in the process of acting.
Since I don't lecture during class, bear with me and read this all the way through. It's important stuff. :)
There are two "schools" of acting:
1. Physicalization:
Acting "in character" is carefully connecting your own life experiences with the experiences of a character, and then working to communicate the similar underlying emotions in a physical way. So actors who work on the principle of physicalization don't necessarily expect to "feel" the same way their character would feel onstage. But they work hard to use their bodies in a way that makes the audience believe that they are.
To do that, the actor has to understand (from the text) why a character is doing or saying what's in the scene. That's the basis for the subtext and the acting that flows from it. But the actor is fully in control of himself/herself at all times. If the script calls for a display of great anger, the actor doesn't actually lose his temper. He makes it LOOK LIKE he does.
2. The "Method"
Acting is truly becoming the character--convincing yourself that you ARE someone else. Method actors work extremely hard to explore every facet of a character's life, to imagine their fantasies, to dream their dreams, to live their lives. A method actor playing a fugitive might take a couple days to live in the woods without showering just to "understand" what fugitive criminals feel like.
Actors spend a lot of time jotting down detailed subtext and motivations for their lines, and developing their "emotional memories" to use onstage. Actors try to THINK their character's thoughts onstage (instead of "Oh my goodness! What's my next cue?!" :)
The majority of American theater schools teach Method Acting.
So ... whaddya think?
Which "method" appeals to you?
Which do you think I'm going to focus on?
:)
14 Comments:
iono.. the first makes more sense to me... it's how I do it myself... but I think getting into character is really good to... so like.. a blend? of the two? ... I guess that'd work. blends are nice.
haha- ... but iono.. when doing my monologue I did the whole Physicalization thing... that helps for being sad... but I guess for when I have to act really hyper and I'm not.. it's not as convicing... cause I don't have any caffiene :p ... but a combination of both sounds like it would work better.. if you don't have anexperience for every few lines- but I also think that convincing yourself that you are someone else.. might not be the best thing... the psycological damage that could do... *shivers* iono.. little sketchy to me.
I'm thinking you'll probably focus on physicalization.
I think i like the first one better :). and i think that you will focus more on the first one...well maybe not, i dont know 'bout you mrs. ramey...hmmm...ok i am gonna stick with my first opinion in saying that you will focus more on the first one, but go with the second one some too...yes, that is my final answer. :-D
i think it changes with the person b/c everyone is different but as for my and my self i will choose the second one, think like the person and thru that, act like the person. but i do think that both of them are really hard and to do either one you need to be an awesome actor(actress).
i think you're gonna teach the first one, otherwise we might be spending one of those long weekends being extremely bored in the woods (and being in the woods during deer huntin season in south carolina doesn't sound too pleasant to me) i'd prefer the first one myself, but like alicia said a mixture might be good.
I like physicalization better; I use it more than the other method. I think you might focus on physicalization, but (like others have said) a mixture of the two methods could be neat.
..hey.. maybe I should comment first more often-
I'm not sure, but it seems like the 2nd choice might potentially be damaging. Not necessarily to us ("amateurs"), but maybe to people who do acting for a living (professionals). If you are constantly trying to "eat, live, and breathe the character", then it might mess you up. Does that make any sense? It made sense in my head... :-D I think you'll probably focus more on the 1st choice, with maybe a little of the 2nd thrown in. Probably. :-)
I am going to go with the first one. One because I enjoy doing that one tons better. Acting is not my most favorite thing to do in the world. Second is because I don't think that totally becoming another person is what we are designed to do. God created each of us uniquly and gave us all different talents and gifts. I am not sure how much becoming someone else on stage is any different than putting on a "mask" everyday to become someone else. As Christians we say that we need to be true faced, to live as Christ made us to be and become who Christ has in mind for us. To spread the Word. I think that many people (notice I didn't say all) act as an escape. It can be a "fun" or relaxing escape. But I don't think it should be used to run away from who Christ made you to be or to try to escape sin. I think we can slip into that way of thinking way too easily already...and acting completely doesn't help it. But I do think that physically acting as someone else for a drama or play is OK. It can be used very powerfully to spread the Gospel effectivly. I don't see how becoming someone else spreads the Gospel. At least any better than simply physically acting does. That might have been to deep of an answer. :)
Bethany
I think the 2nd is the one I used and will continue using.The more you study the meanings inside the script.Though you could use the psy for acting I think tyhe 2nd or blending the two would also work,just like alicia said.For me I have to have too practise about a bizillion times so I can finally get the lines ,and while doing this I write key points and emotions that I believe my character is going through.
Abigail
exactly jessie- *nodds*
well, this has certainly stirred up some good discussion. ;)
i'll post soon on my perspective ... till then, I'm waiting to hear from a few more of you . . .
the first one seems a little bit easier... if you try to make yourself think you "are" the charcter you could have some wack brain thing happen....but i guess it could sorta help you feel really comfortable with the charcter and feel like you know them well....
yehp, good discusions come from good questions
;-)
Everyone had good thoughts. I think it's interesting how different all the oppinions are!
Post a Comment
<< Home